Tennessee AG joins effort to block Equal Rights Amendment

State Attorney General Herbert Slatery, right, speaks with Rep. Jerry Sexton (R-Bean Station) on the House floor in Nashville on Feb. 3, 2020. (Erik Schelzig, Tennessee Journal)

Tennessee Attorney General Herbert Slatery is joining four counterparts in Republican states in trying to block an effort to revive the Equal Rights Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Virginia lawmakers last month ratified the amendment stating that “equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.” Supporters argue that Virginia is the 38th state to approve of the language, meeting the requirement that three-fourths of states agree to amend the Constitution.

Opponents point to the a ratification deadline set by Congress was 1979 and that it was later extended only to 1982. Those deadlines are unenforceable, according to a lawsuit filed by Virginia, Illinois, and Nevada.

Tennessee lawmakers approved the amendment in 1972, but voted to rescinded their action in 1974.

Read the release from Slatery’s office after the jump:

(Nashville) — Tennessee has joined Alabama, Louisiana, Nebraska, and South Dakota in a motion to intervene in litigation over whether the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) can be placed into the Constitution more than forty years after the 1979 deadline for ratifying the proposed amendment expired.

Three States — Illinois, Nevada, and Virginia — recently sued the Archivist of the United States — the federal officer who oversees the ratification process for constitutional amendments — seeking to require him to add the ERA to the Constitution.  In their view, the 1979 ratification deadline is unenforceable, even though Congress and the States understood when the ERA was submitted to the States for ratification in 1972 that the ERA would expire if thirty-eight States (three-fourths of 50) did not ratify it by that deadline.  The three States also take the view that, even though five of the States needed to reach thirty-eight changed their minds and rescinded their ratifications before the 1979 deadline, those rescissions do not count.

Tennessee, Alabama, Louisiana, Nebraska, and South Dakota are intervening in the case to argue that the deadline for ratifying the ERA has long expired.  The intervenor States will also explain why the decisions of the five States to rescind their ratifications must be given effect.

“Tennessee was one of five states that rescinded its ratification before the 1979 deadline,” said Attorney General Herbert H. Slatery III. “Tennessee has an interest in ensuring that its vote to reject the ERA is given effect and that the explicit timeframe set by Congress to ratify the ERA is enforced.  As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg recently stated, the ERA cannot become part of the Constitution unless it is ‘put back in the political hopper and we start over again collecting the necessary states to ratify it.’  Until that happens, Tennessee will continue to fight to protect the progress women have made and to defend the rule of law upon which we all depend.”

9 Responses to Tennessee AG joins effort to block Equal Rights Amendment

  • James White says:

    The ERA is Dead. It failed to receive the votes need in the time limit.
    The ERA Is a BAD idea.
    The Liberal Judge is correct on this one. And States and Congress needs to quit wasting the time (and money) on this.
    VETO

    • John says:

      Looks like AG is the true executive of this state. He probably told Cuckold Bill Lee to send the FMLA bill to the legislature to be killed by the fat asses with small hands in the General Assembly.

  • James White says:

    This is a backdoor attempt to revive the ill conceived Article V Constitutional Amendment processes that have been done in 28 states (Tennessee included ! ) . We need to rescind our current calls for a Con-Con.
    The enemy of liberty will stop at nothing to get a Constitutional Convention and then destroy our Constitution.

  • Phil Lassiter says:

    Can’t believe our AG has the guts to stand up

  • Donna Locke says:

    I worked to get the ERA ratified the first time around. It should be in the U.S. Constitution. The governing administration we have in this state now is equivalent to a religious patriarchy that has at its head a man who fancies himself as a messiah-king.

    I never thought it would come to this for me, but I am closer and closer to voting for a sane Democrat for governor next time if no good independent is on the ballot.

    • James White says:

      Donna, Are women in need of any equality they don’t already possess?
      This amendment would mean the elimination of separate bathroom or locker room facilities for men and women, girls and boys (or ‘transgender’). If there is a military draft, then they would have to include women, and women serving in the military would have to have equal access to the same combat positions as men. It would mean more lawsuits to end discrimination in sports competitions…
      It would mean that the Federal Government would be in every aspect of anything doing between men and women.
      No thanks.

      • rachel says:

        No man would ever ask that question. We really don’t need you noble men to protect us from the world.

        As for your arguments, a) they aren’t all true, and b) so what.?

    • Eddie White says:

      If you really want to pass the ERA, and if you really want to drive religion from the public square, you really should support the Democratic candidates. That is your best shot. Voting independent really won’t get it done.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *